Jane Austen is
considered one of the greats of her time. She knew how to poke fun at the rich
and pompous, without pushing it too far, and her satiric irony is still
relevant today. When people think of Austen though, they immediately think of Pride and Prejudice or Emma. Both are phenomenal novels with
strong protagonist characters in Elizabeth and Emma but the book most
forget—that could have the greater deeper meaning—is Northanger Abbey.
The novel has a
ditzy and “occasionally stupid” lead character in Catherine that which already
alludes to the fact that this book isn’t like her other works (Austen 2). It is
a satiric story about the silly fears people had about the gothic novel. In the
18th century people believed that by reading these books they would
live a corrupted lifestyle and Austen wrote the novel to poke fun at the
ridiculousness of the idea. This book is the road map for how to navigate
around fiction and not take it all to heart—people can read for fun and
entertainment without being corrupted.
Personally though,
I think it might also be a book about how to navigate around what to read and
how much a person should actually indulge in fiction and read a wide variety of
things so that the person is a well-rounded individual.
As Austen does
write novels she explains that “I
will not adopt the ungenerous custom” of degrading the novel, because as she
sees it she can’t let her heroine “take up a novel” and “open the pages and
turn her head in disgust” when in reality the heroine is within the very thing
she is disgusted about (Austen Northanger
Abbey 18). Austen sees novels as another tool to learn from.
An advice writer
for girls during this time was Hester Chapone and she had a similar stance on
the subject. In Hester Chapone’s essay, Letters
on the Improvement of the Mind, she writes to her nieces about the
importance of having a second opinion on all things a person reads, especially
if it is of questionable content. Chapone understood that reading was necessary
but didn’t want her nieces to have a corrupted mind, so she said to always take
the “judgment of your best friend” first when deciding to read fiction (Chapone
189). A person needs that older and wiser adult leading their mind in the
correct direction as to not make harmful mistakes. Chapone wanted her nieces to
understand that a trusted adult could make the judgment call for them because
they have lived life and could send them down the correct path.
Chapone, like
Austen understands that fiction is needed in life if a person wants to be
well-rounded and well informed in society. This same type of thinking can be
applied today.
My mom always
says, “even if you don’t agree with someone’s opinion hear them out and know
every side of a topic before drawing conclusions.” This same philosophy can be
applied with books. A person needs to see all sides of a story to know the
facts. So “all sides of the story” would be those questionable books that
people are warned not to read. Get the warning, understand what is being
cautioned about the novel and make the judgment for yourself. Read with your
mentor’s perspective in mind—this person is someone you think highly of—and
remember what they found iffy about the book and make the call yourself.
Isn't it interesting that we associate Austen with marriage--and with the great characters of Elizabeth and Emma--but not always with developing good judgment and critical thinking. That may be one of the many misperceptions about her. You might want to look at this take on the problem, too!
ReplyDeletehttp://vampiresandothergirlythings.blogspot.com/